Venue: Members' Room - Shire Hall, Gloucester. View directions
To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 29 May 2019.
The minutes of the meeting held on 29 May 2019 were confirmed and signed as a correct record.
To answer any written public questions about matters which are within the powers and duties of the Committee. The closing date/time for receipt of questions is 10.00am on Monday 7th October 2019.
No public questions had been received.
To answer any written members’ questions. The closing date/time for the receipt of questions is 10.00am on Monday 7th October 2019.
No questions from members had been received.
To consider the attached report.
5.1 Simon Harper, Head of Democratic Services, gave a brief summary of the report for the Committee. It was explained that in forming the three options available for members, Democratic Services had reviewed the GCC employees parental leave policy, and other public sector schemes including specifically the LGA Labour Group Scheme.
5.2 It was noted that members were not paid employees of the Council and thus the employees existing policy could not simply be adopted for members as well. There had been examples of members being away from the Council for a period of time in the past and the relevant political group and Democratic Services have been able to put the necessary cover arrangements in place to ensure that enquiries from constituents were dealt with.
5.3 It was highlighted that any policy would have to reflect both the basic allowance and special responsibility allowance, whilst also taking into account elections, changes in administration and new appointments.
5.4 The Committee was asked to consider the three options summarised at the end of the report.
5.5 Members acknowledged the need for any policy for councillors to take account of the election process as outlined above, but were keen that it also should remain, as far as possible, consistent with the employees scheme and not create any preferential treatment for councillors.
5.6 There was a question in relation to a cabinet member being absent through parental leave or long term sick how their cabinet responsibilities will be covered. It was advised that whilst off, the cabinet member would still receive their Special Responsibility Allowance but another existing cabinet member would be delegated responsibility for their portfolio in their absence. It was requested that officers also consider a policy on long-term sickness for councillors.
ACTION DEMOCRATIC SERVICES
5.7 In responding to a question, officers advised that employees were only required to have 2 weeks off post the birth as a minimum. Employees also retained their entitlement to leave in the event of a still birth or miscarriage in line with legislation.
5.8 Members discussed the legal duty (under the Local Government Action 1972) of a member to attend a meeting of council within a 6 month period. It was advised that if a member was away longer than 6 months, there would have to be a resolution of Council excusing them from attending a meeting.
5.9 It was suggested that a sensible approach for the parental leave policy would be to add in an assumption that if a member was off due to parental leave, they would not be attending meetings within that set period. However, this would still require a motion approving that specific absence. It was advised that proxy voting did not currently exist.
5.10 If a member was on parental leave that ran through an election period then it would end at the election. If they were re-elected, any previous arrangements would ‘reset’ under a new council term.
5.11 Members were advised that there could be some difficulties with replicating ... view the full minutes text for item 5.
To consider the attached report on changes to the Audit and Governance Committee’s Terms of Reference which was presented to the Audit and Governance Committee on 11th October 2019.
6.1 The Chair requested that presenting officer Rob Ayliffe took items 6 and 7 together due to both being related to the Audit and Governance Committee.
6.2 It was advised that during the discussion at the Audit and Governance Committee on the amended terms of reference, it was requested a final amendment be made requiring regular compulsory training for members.
6.3 The Committee expressed concern about requiring members to attend training. Whilst they appreciated the importance of understanding for Audit and Governance, it was not a legal requirement as with some Committees and it could undermine Group Leaders role in appointing members to Committee if training was compulsory to sit.
6.4 It was agreed that the wording should be changed to reflect an expectation to attend training annually, rather than a compulsion. Officers assured members that they would make sure enough training sessions were made available to members throughout the year.
ACTION: ROB AYLIFFE
RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL that the changes to the
Constitution in respect of the Audit and Governance Terms of Reference be ratified, subject to the following additional wording:
Members of the Audit and Governance Committee will be expected to attend training that will be provided at least annually.
To consider the attached report, which was presented to the Audit and Governance Committee on 11th October 2019.
7.1 Members discussed whether it was necessary to prevent certain people applying at first instance as referenced in Appendix 2.
7.2 It was suggested it may be more appropriate to advise applicants they are likely to be unsuccessful if they fell within the disqualifications, rather than excluding them from the outset. Members noted for example, there were examples in other Committees where members of other local authorities have worked well as independent involvement. In order to capture as wide a field as possible, it would be best to keep the selection criteria as open as possible for initial applications.
7.3 The Committee was also asked to approve the interview panel as outlined in the report. It was noted that as drafted this would not result in the panel being politically balanced as it did not include a Conservative member.
RESOLVED TO APPROVE the recruitment pack and interview panel as presented, subject to the following changes:
· Remove section A of Appendix 2;
· Replace the final two paragraphs of page 6 with the following wording:
Given the independent nature of this role, it is unlikely that we would appoint a person who:
· has within the period of five years immediately preceding the date of the appointment been a member or officer of Gloucestershire County Council
· is a serving member or officer of any other local authority, or
· is a relative of close friend of a member or officer of Gloucestershire County Council
Please see appendix 2 for further details on Disqualifications for Appointment.
· To increase the interview panel by one to include a member of the Conservative Group for political balance.
To consider the attached changes to the Scheme of Delegation.
RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL to ratify the changes to the Constitution made by the Monitoring Officer relating to the Scheme of Delegation.
To note the attached reports.
RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL to ratify the changes to the Constitution made by the Monitoring Officer.
Motions at Full Council
Cllr Stowe has requested that the procedure for motions at full councils be considered by the Committee, in order to increase transparency for members and the public, and to ensure that the implications in terms of the effect on protected groups, environmental impacts and cost are all made clear.
10.1 Cllr Stowe introduced this item by explaining to members that there needed to be a review of the criteria for motions submitted to full Council. He emphasised that good decision making, members needed to fully understand any implications of a motion passing, with particular regard to costs, environmental impact and the effect on any protected group.
10.2 This would mean that both members proposing a motion and the wider membership of the Council understood its implications.
10.3 Some members highlighted some initial difficulties with the practicalities of introducing a scheme:
· If the motion was calling for a policy to be developed, implications would only be evident once the policy had been drafted by officers, and at the time of proposing the motion, it would be difficult to understand these fully.
· The issue of ‘on the day’ amendments to motions. Some amendments could be quite significant to the conclusion of the motion and therefore might completely change the implications if passed in an amended form.
10.4 It was suggested an option could be for all motions to be referred to the relevant scrutiny committee for consideration before returning to Council, in order for the implications to be fully explored. In response, it was highlighted this might be an option for topic specific motions but would be difficult to apply when there were broad ranging statements of intent that might impact on a number of different areas.
10.5 It was advised that there are requirements within other local authorities that all motions were signed off by Section 151 officers/Chief Executives before being submitted.
10.6 The Committee requested that officers look into processes at other local authorities and return to the Committee with options.
ACTION: DEMOCRATIC SERVICES