Venue: Members' Room - Shire Hall, Gloucester. View directions
Contact: Stephen Bace 01452 324204
Declaration of interests
Owen Shaw informed the Board that he had been co-opted as a Govenor at Cirencester College.
30.1 The minutes were approved as a correct record.
30.2 Board members considered the actions from the previous meeting.
30.3 The Board was informed
that the National Scheme Advisory Board recommended high level Key
Performance Indicators were still in draft form. Gloucestershire
would wait until they were formalised.
30.4 The Pension Administration Report which had been received by Pension Committee in May 2016 was circulated for the Board. This included benchmarking data which presented Gloucestershire as one of the lowest cost funds as well as being low on staff numbers. Although additional staff had been recruited, draft figures for 2015/16 still showed Gloucestershire as one of the lowest cost Funds. A staffing review of the Pension Team was being undertaken with proposals to increase staff further.
30.5 In response to a question, it was explained that there had been an increase in workload for the pension team due to the new 2014 care LGPS scheme; a lot more information was required from employers and there were additional updates required to the administration systems.
30.6 While responses to the benchmarking data were anonymised, a comparator group of fifteen would be selected; these generally included the members of the Brunel group and other LGPS Funds of a similar size to the Gloucestershire Fund. The data from this would be shared with the Pension Board.
ACTION Graham Burrow
30.7 Local performance
indictors for 2014/15 and 2015/16 showed a reduction in performance
levels. Concern was expressed by the Board about the revised
performance targets which allowed for additional days to complete
tasks. The Board questioned whether these targets had been revised
due to the original targets being unrealistic or due to comparisons
with other Funds. The Board requested that they be provided with
30.8 The Board noted the positive actions that had been taken to improve the timeliness of returns for the Annual Benefit Statement.
For the Board to note the minutes of the Committee meeting on 12 August 2016.
31.1 The Board noted the minutes of the last Pension Committee meeting. In response to a question on item 75 in relation to Cotswold Water Park, it was explained that further detail would be available in the exempt minutes that would be circulated prior to the next Pension Committee meeting.
31.2 Confirmation of the
date in January for the annual training day would be
The Board noted the report which had been agreed by the Chairman and Officers.
33.1 The Board received the
Risk Register that had been considered by the Pension Committee in
August. This included a new risk (G8) which was linked to IT
vulnerabilities through malicious attacks. There was some
discussion around the differences between this risk which were
assessed as being ‘medium’ and risk (G7) which was
‘low’. It was explained that G8 related to external
attacks and therefore even with mitigation there was still an
element of risk that could not be controlled. G7 related to
internal processes and therefore there was a greater deal of
control. It was requested that the wording be amended to make this
33.2 Some discussion was given to the impact of mitigation on risks such as G8. The Board considered whether for a risk such as G8, the likelihood or impact of the risk would be affected by putting in measures of control.
33.3 The risk levels for
(F1 and F5) had not changed, but given the market fluctuations it
was important to keep an eye on market returns. Short term
fluctuations could be managed but any more permanent changes to
returns would have to be taken into account. It was suggested that
the comments shown for these risks be extended into the further
actions section on the spreadsheet.
33.4 The Board noted that
for the majority of the risks the impact was considered moderate.
It was suggested that in future the report include the guidance on
the different categories to help the Board’s
33.5 The Board expressed
some surprise that the direction of travel had not changed since
they had last considered the register. They asked that these points
relating to the Risk Register be shared with the Pension
Exclusion of press and public
That in accordance with Section 100 A (4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the public be excluded from the meeting for the following agenda items, because it is likely that if members of the public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12 A to the Act and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information to the public.
RESOLVED that, in accordance with Section 100 A (4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the public be excluded from the meeting for the following agenda items, because it is likely that if members of the public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12 A to the Act and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information to the public.
Update on Brunel Pension Pooling
Awareness Briefing Slides
The Board were updated on the proposals, including timescales.
To agree a date for the new meeting.
The Board agreed that a meeting be arranged in